Thursday, January 3, 2013

Coalition of nuns, evangelical Catholic group back Illinois gay ...

Updated Jan. 3, 10:10 a.m.

nuns

Photo: Stock image.

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. ? Sister Donna Quinn, a Chicago native who has been a Catholic nun for over 50 years, said it?s about time for Illinois to approve legislation that would legalize same-sex marriage.

?We believe in this, this has to be done,? she said. ?We can do nothing less.?

Quinn, the coordinator of the National Coalition of American Nuns, which comprises over 2,000 nuns from across the country, said giving gay and lesbian couples the right to marry is about fairness and respecting the love of people in committed relationships.

This breaks away from messages from the Chicago Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church, which is advocating against the bill.

?It?s more of a belief in people, in all people, gay and lesbian and ? it doesn?t matter,? said Quinn. ?Their choice to marry is important and the benefits are crucial for their living, their livelihood, and the children they raise.?

Quinn and other members of the local faith community have thrown their support behind the Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act, a bill that could potentially see a vote in the Illinois Senate as early as Thursday and in the Illinois House as early as Sunday or Monday.

?I think the support from the religious community is heartwarming,? said Rick Garcia, longtime LGBT rights activist and director of the Equal Marriage Project at The Civil Rights Agenda. ?It?s critical. It?s critical to counter the anti-gay fundamentalists and Catholic bishops.?

Quinn and several religious leaders are condemning recent comments by Chicago Cardinal Francis George of the Roman Catholic Church, in which he said same-sex marriage violates natural law because gay and lesbian couples cannot produce children. George sent a pastoral letter to local Catholic priests, urging them to lobby against the bill.

?Civil laws that establish ?same sex marriage? create a legal fiction,? George wrote, ?The State has no power to create something that nature itself tells us is impossible.?

But a recent poll?conducted by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University released in late September that shows a majority of Illinois Catholics approve of legally recognized same-sex unions.

Eighty-one percent of Catholics surveyed support either full marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples or the right to a civil union. Specifically, 39.9 percent said they support marriage rights and 40.1 percent said their position is for same-sex couples to have civil unions. Only 15.7 percent said there should be no legal recognition of same-sex relationships,?according to the poll.

The numbers suggest that Catholics, too, are part of the growing wave of support for the bill, and others in the faith community won?t let George?s calls against it go unchallenged.

Bishop Alan Wilkowski of the Evangelical Catholic Diocese of the Northwest issued his own letter Wednesday to lawmakers and made direct phone calls to some, urging them to support the bill and debunk ?the myths advocated in the Cardinal?s letter,? he said.

?Based on our baptismal promise, I think that as men an women of faith, we have a right and obligation to enhance and protect the civil and human rights of all people,? Wilkowski said. ?When religious communities ? when they recognize their obligation as stewards of God?s creating ? we have to do everything possible to improve the lives of all people. We cannot sit by silently and let people get relegated to less than equal status than other people.

Wilkowski argues that George is overstepping Catholic teachings, as well as the concept of an individual?s internal forum, by demanding government policy match the rules of his church, he said.

?We don?t live in a theocracy,? the Bishop said. ?For the Cardinal to state that because of Roman Catholic ecclesiology, civil law must mirror that ? that is voicing their beliefs on every man and woman in this state.?

However, Wilkowski believes the Cardinal and the Roman Catholic Church have the right to their own beliefs.

?If Rome wishes to limit marriage to just heterosexual couples, they can do that,? he said.

In addition, Wilkowski explains in his letter that marriage has been through several evolutions since the beginning of mankind and that it should no longer be attached to procreating.

?There?s never been a set concept of what marriage is.?If we go back to before christianity, marriage was simply for procreation. Men had wives, it was simply for the purpose of procuring male offspring. That was considered the norm for centuries,??he told?Chicago Phoenix.

?The Cardinal?s letter insults the intelligence of men and women by reducing natural law to some sort of circus acrobatic act,? he said, referring to sex for procreation. ?The vocation of marriage is more than what one does in the bedroom. It is how two people come together, sharing their faith and the holy spirit in their lives. What do they do to build up the kingdom of God on earth.?

Both Quinn and Wilkowski are optimistic about the bill?s chances in the General Assembly but point out that the Catholic Church is pouring a lot of money into the same-sex marriage debate here.

?A lot of money is spent by leaders in the Catholic community against this issue,? Quinn said. ?I don?t think that is as well known as other issues. When so much money is spent against women, marriage equality, reproductive justice ? these are issues that when Catholic money is thrown to lobby against it, people need to rise up against it in protest.?

They praise people throughout the religious community and elsewhere for supporting the bill.

?I just feel very hopeful for this movement,? Quinn said.

Source: http://chicagophoenix.com/2013/01/02/coalition-of-nuns-evangelical-catholic-group-back-illinois-gay-marriage-bill/

the Rumble 2012 Columbus Day 2012 carlina white Sam Champion Engaged Infield fly rule Taken 2 Venezuela Elections

Bucks County Small Business Providing Healthcare To Workers ...

By Jennifer Bernstein

DOYLESTOWN, Pa. (CBS) ? For more than 40 years, Superior Woodcraft?s cabinet makers and artisans have created and sold custom cabinetry. But the last few years haven?t been easy, since this line of work closely follows the housing industry.

?What people fail to realize is probably about 70 percent of cabinet makers are currently not working as cabinet makers,? said owner Patrick Kennedy.

Kennedy has done what was necessary to make sure this small business, which employs a little more than 50 people, survives.

One of the biggest challenges he faced was providing healthcare to workers in 2012. Kennedy immediately began to look at the company?s bottom line.

?It was really a question of how much is it going to cost? How much can we afford to pay? Sharing- employees are going to have to share in that,? said Kennedy.

It?s a requirement many businesses will face. President Obama?s health care law mandates employers with more than 50 employees provide coverage, or face steep fines starting in 2014.

Kennedy negotiated with vendors, and also made three percent of his full time positions part time.

Health care costs hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, and takes up a significant portion of their expenses, but he says it?s worth it.

Kennedy also uses preventative care to keep costs down, ?we use doctors to come in, talk to our employees.?

One of their main goals is to not pass the cost onto the customer, it?s something Kennedy says the company will continue to strive for in 2013.

Source: http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/01/02/bucks-county-small-business-providing-healthcare-to-workers-in-2013/

earthquake california roy orbison the third man 2012 nfl draft order mohamed sanu chris polk chicago bulls

World looks to 2013 after violence, economic woes

Confetti flies over New York's Times Square after the clock strikes midnight during the New Year's Eve celebration as seen from the Marriott Marquis hotel Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013 in New York. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

Confetti flies over New York's Times Square after the clock strikes midnight during the New Year's Eve celebration as seen from the Marriott Marquis hotel Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013 in New York. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)

Fireworks explode over Elizabeth Tower housing the Big Ben clock to celebrate the New Year in London, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Fireworks light up San Francisco Bay as the west coast city rings in the New Year 2013. The Embarcadero was again the focal point of the New Year's celebrations as people from all over the Bay Area came to ring in the new year on Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle)

Fireworks light up San Francisco Bay as the west coast city rings in the New Year 2013. The Embarcadero was again the focal point of the New Year's celebrations as people from all over the Bay Area came to ring in the new year on Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle)

Confetti and other items from the New Year's festivities litters the street in New York's Times Square early Tuesday morning Jan. 1, 2013. (AP Photo/Tina Fineberg)

NEW YORK (AP) ? As the world rang in 2013 with spectacular fireworks displays and showers of confetti, the specter of economic uncertainty and searing violence dimmed some festivities and weighed on the minds of revelers hoping for a better year.

"With all the sadness in the country, we're looking for some good changes in 2013," Laura Concannon, of Hingham, Mass., said as she, her husband, Kevin, and his parents joined hundreds of thousands of people who celebrated the new year in Times Square on Monday.

Matias Dellanno, 37, of Buenos Aires, Argentina, stood in the middle of the square with his wife and 3-year-old son. His eyes caught the multicolored lighting illuminating the square just before midnight.

"I feel a completely new hope for 2013," he said. "It can't be any worse than last year, when my business lost clients. It was a rough year for everyone. The new year has to be better!"

Revelers with New Year's hats and sunglasses boasting "2013" packed the streets in the 35-degree cold to count down the first ball drop in decades without Dick Clark, who died in April and was honored with his name printed on confetti and on one of the crystal panels on the Times Square ball.

Syracuse University student Taylor Nanz, 18, said she and a friend had been standing in Times Square since 1:20 p.m. Monday. They hadn't moved from their spot because "if you leave, you lose your place," she said.

"It's the first time ? and the last time," she said. "Never again."

Security in Times Square was tight, with a mass of uniformed police and plainclothes officers assigned to blend into the crowd. Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly claimed that Times Square would be the "safest place in the world on New Year's Eve," and officers used barriers to prevent overcrowding and checkpoints to inspect vehicles, enforce an alcohol ban and check handbags.

In the state capital of California, a midnight fireworks show was canceled after a fight at a Sacramento restaurant ended with two people fatally shot and three wounded.

But in Las Vegas, police and about 300 Nevada National Guard troops kept the night peaceful, with only 13 people arrested. Sin City hosted sold-out concerts featuring Beyonce, the Red Hot Chili Peppers and the Black Keys, and revelers jammed the Strip to watch as seven hotel-casinos unleashed identical eight-minute rooftop fireworks displays at midnight.

The celebrations on the West Coast took place nearly 24 hours after lavish fireworks displays lit up skylines in Sydney, Hong Kong and Shanghai.

In Myanmar, about 90,000 people gathered in a field to watch a countdown for the first time, according to organizers. The reformist government that took office in 2011 in the country, long under military rule, threw its first public New Year's celebration in decades.

In the United Arab Emirates city of Dubai, multicolored fireworks danced up and down the world's tallest building, the Burj Khalifa.

In Rome, Pope Benedict XVI celebrated with a vespers service in St. Peter's Basilica to give thanks for 2012 and look ahead to 2013. He said that despite all the death and injustice in the world, goodness prevails. A man scaled the scaffolding around St. Peter's Square and draped a banner calling on the pope to "Stop Terrorism."

In Russia, spectators filled Moscow's Red Square as fireworks exploded near the Kremlin. In Rio de Janeiro, revelers dressed head-to-toe in white as dictated by Brazilian tradition flooded onto Copacabana beach for a concert.

In London, the chimes of the clock inside the Big Ben tower counted down the final seconds of 2012 and fireworks dazzled the sky above Parliament Square. Streamers shot out of the London Eye wheel and blazing rockets launched from the banks of the River Thames.

But parts of Europe held scaled-back festivities and street parties, the mood was restrained ? if hopeful ? for a 2013 that is projected to be a sixth straight year of recession amid Greece's worst economic crisis since World War II.

Festivities were canceled across New Delhi, the Indian capital, amid days of mourning and reflection about women's safety after a rape victim died on Saturday.

In Times Square, some revelers checked their cellphones for news of lawmakers' tentative deal to skirt the so-called fiscal cliff, a combination of expiring tax cuts and spending cuts that threatened to reverberate globally. The U.S. Senate approved a bill to avert the cliff well after midnight, though a vote in the House was pending Tuesday or Wednesday.

The recent elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., and the devastation from Superstorm Sandy also mingled amid the memories of 2012.

"This has been a very eventful year, on many levels," Denise Norris said as she and her husband, the Rev. Urie Norris, surveyed the Times Square crowd waiting for the countdown show with Ryan Seacrest as host.

Seacrest remembered Clark and his legacy, saying it was one that would be continued, and that Clark himself had told him: "Seacrest, the show must go on."

Yvonne Gomez, 53, a physician from Grand Forks, N.D., glowed as she and her husband, 63-year-old potato farmer Gregg Halverson, took in the festivities in New York.

"I couldn't begin the new year in a more beautiful way," she said. "I married him two weeks ago and here we are in the middle of Times Square celebrating the new year ? two widowers who found each other."

For Elvis Rivera, of Manhattan, who stopped by Times Square to take photos, 2012 a death and job losses in his family. How did he feel about its end?

"Relieved," Rivera said.

___

Associated Press writers Hannah Drier in Las Vegas; Colleen Long in New York; Aye Aye Win in Yangon, Myanmar; Silvia Hui in London, and Ashok Sharma in New Delhi contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-01-01-New%20Year's%20Celebrations/id-51da9eade4d5430488a7c4127f8bdbea

H c mitt romney mark zuckerberg mark zuckerberg maurice jones drew Yash Chopra

If baby's crawling, you'll probably be up more at night, study reveals

Jan. 2, 2013 ? Infants who have started crawling wake up more often at night compared to the period before the crawling, reveals a new study by Dr. Dina Cohen of the University of Haifa's Department of Counseling and Human Development.

The doctoral study, conducted under the supervision of Prof. Anat Scher, observed 28 healthy babies who were developing normally, examining them once every two to three weeks. Their motor development and sleeping habits were monitored from age 4-5 months and continued until age 11 months. Their sleep patterns were measured by a device called an ActiGraph that provides objective evaluations of sleep patterns, taken together with parental reports from diaries and questionnaires. The infants' crawling development and progress was observed and videoed by the researcher.

The study showed that the average age for the babies to begin crawling was 7 months, and that this was accompanied by an increase in the number of times they woke up at night, from an average of 1.55 times per night to 1.98 times (based on the ActiGraph measurements). The incidents of wakefulness also lasted longer, about 10 minutes on average, as per parental reports.

The study also found that the scope and complexity of the changes -- which included waking more frequently and moving around a lot during asleep -- were more pronounced among those who started crawling earlier. By contrast, those who started to crawl later demonstrated only one change: waking up more frequently.

The good news for parents: Within three months from the day crawling begins, the baby will generally return to the sleep patterns from before acquiring the new motor skill.

According to Dr. Cohen, there are a number of reasons why starting to crawl and wakefulness could be linked. "It is possible that crawling, which involves a vast range of changes and psychological reorganization in the babies' development, increases their level of arousal, influences their ability to regulate themselves and causes a period of temporary instability that expresses itself in waking up more frequently," she suggests.

Increased restlessness in babies who crawl early, she says, could be attributed to the baby's expressing fears of being physically distanced from the mother before fully developing the psychological mechanisms to cope with separation effectively. "This fear is likely to be expressed in sleep interruptions during the night," she explained.

"With ongoing monitoring of babies' development, we can demonstrate that the increased awakenings are a temporary short-term phenomenon, which occurs as part of a wider process of the baby's gradually improving ability to regulate states of sleep and wakefulness," adds Dr. Cohen.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of Haifa.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/f8XIpfRWb1Y/130102104555.htm

2012 oscar nominations kyle williams florida debate rand paul mark kirk florida gop debate freddie mac

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Video: Will 'Cliff' Deal Change 2013 Market Forecast?

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://video.msnbc.msn.com/cnbc/50342588/

joe paterno memorial service taco bell breakfast menu ener1 national chocolate cake day epstein joshua komisarjevsky barney frank

The Price for Speaking Out of Turn: The impact of PR blunders on ...

Measuring the impact of PR blunders by Papa John?s, G4S, and Apple.

From mixing politics with fast food to releasing software that is widely hated, public relations disasters have significant repercussions on a company?s bottom line. Or do they? Here we take a look at three of the biggest corporate nightmares of 2012 and briefly assess their impact on stock price and reputation.

Papa John?s Obamacare Gaffe: A Flash in the (Pizza) Pan?

What happened?

Unsurprisingly, it appears that political rhetoric and the pizza business don?t mix. Such is the harsh lesson that Papa John?s CEO John Schnatter learned after he doubled down on criticism of Obamacare following the re-election of President Obama. Mr. Schnatter implied that his company would deliberately downsize worker hours in order to remain below the 30 hour mandatory threshold to provide insurance. The stance, which accompanied similar sentiments from Applebee?s franchise owner Zane Tankel, quickly did the rounds of popular online news sites.

The result?

By the time the company started to react the damage was done, with the company?s buzz on YouGov?s Brand Index survey dropping from 32 on Election Day to a dismal score of 4 three weeks later. (YouGov BrandIndex?s Buzz score asks respondents, ?If you?ve heard anything about the brand in the last two weeks, through advertising, news, or word of mouth, was it positive or negative??) Papa John?s share price dropped by over half. See the charts below.

Mr Schnatter issued a public apology and claimed his words had been twisted. He went on to clarify he was glad that healthcare insurance would be covering 100% of the population, but that all he meant was that, ?we?re all going to pay for it. There?s nothing for free?. Regardless, Papa John?s YouGov buzz score throughout November showed no sign of recovery, even as the share price bounced back.

Bottom line impact?

One is left with the feeling that while business prices can rally, reputation is far harder to regain.

YouGov BrandIndex Buzz score shows restaurants? reputation decline after anti-Obamacare statements:

Share price of Papa John?s declines then recovers after CEO?s anti-Obamacare statements:

Stock Price

G4S Olympic Security Failure: Losing the Race for New Business

What happened?

Last summer, things were going well for private security firm G4S. In an interview in July, Ian Horseman Sewell, Managing Director of Global Events, boasted that the security firm was ?absolutely on track to deliver? on their contract for the London Olympics, and added that, ?If there was a similar event going on in Australia, I would be bullish that we could deliver that at the same time?. He also noted that favourable media exposure could attract many more customers, but warned that ?the sensitive, high-profile nature of security meant G4S ran the risk of its image being damaged if problems occurred?.

As it turns out, he was right, but not in the way he would have hoped. Two days later the UK Sunday papers declared that the firm being paid ?300m to guard the Olympics had, ?yet to fully train or accredit thousands of security guards needed to protect the games from terrorist attack?.

The result?

The story exploded, leading the UK government to announce that it would be forced to bring in the army to cover the shortfall, in some cases with troops not long returned from Afghanistan, touching a nerve with the British papers.

Unfortunately for G4S, the story spread far beyond the British mainstream: Over subsequent days the phrase ?humiliating shambles? had to be translated into at least 30 languages for international media headlines. G4S? share price duly crumbled. Journalists also used this event to recap and dig into other controversies surrounding the company, furthering the fiasco.

As it turned out, overall security at the Olympics was effective and the stand-in troops became a surprise hit with the crowds. The media spotlight has since moved away from the tribulations of G4S, however, the firm?s reputation has yet to recover. Share price has regained some of the losses suffered, but has yet to make a full recovery.

Bottom line impact?

Perhaps the most telling effect is that the company went on to lose a contract to run Britain?s first private prison and failed to win any new contracts in the biggest round of prison privatisation in England and Wales so far. Although Prisons Minister Jeremy Wright assured newspapers that the decision was unrelated to the Olympics fiasco, most news of the matter made that connection. Not a good year for the folks at G4S.

Share price of G4S falls and slowly recovers following its Olympic security difficulties:

G4S Share Price

Apple Pays the Price of Seeming to Be Perfect: Loses its Way with Maps and Scuffgate

What happened?

The introduction of Maps, Apple?s in-house mapping system, finally severed the company?s dependence on its rival?s platform Google Maps and was originally welcomed with glee. However, a definitive PR disaster ensued when Maps? maps were found to lack accuracy and made some high-profile mistakes. It didn?t help matters that the iPhone bumped Google Maps for the defective newcomer. Given the high-profile of the launch and the internet-savvy nature of tech enthusiasts, it wasn?t long until Apple faced the full brunt of accusations that Maps was the ?worst software update in Apple?s history?.

Complaints over the new Maps app were compounded when information emerged that a high percentage of iPhone 5s were arriving with scuffing and scratches on the phone?s aluminum exterior. The problem received major media attention, prompting Apple to increase quality control in its Chinese factories and slow production. Although minor (especially considering the iPhone 4?s Antennagate debacle) this has not stopped ardent consumers from pushing Apple for a recall. Hell hath no fury like an angry fan-boy.

The result?.

Criticism of the Maps app was so endemic that Apple has taken significant steps to address it. Scott Forstall, head of the company?s mobile software division and a prot?g? of Steve Jobs, was dismissed following reports that he refused to sign a letter of apology to Apple consumers over the matter. Tim Cook, the company?s CEO, went on to sign said letter in his stead.

Apple?s share price has seen some shrinkage (see the chart below), but there are too many influences at work to pin it entirely on Maps. Some have called the stock overvalued, after more than doubling in the past year. And its price drop may be at least partly a result of less-than-expected demand for the iPhone 5 following its launch.

Bottom line impact?

Apple?s reputation and brand are extremely strong. It may, in fact, suffer from seeming to be too perfect. Although many would no doubt like to see Apple knocked off its pedestal, one bad app won?t spoil the whole Apple.

While this double PR disaster has probably provoked some consumers to consider alternatives, the iPhone 5 remains a complete success, selling over 5 million units in its first weekend in shops. Sometimes it?s heartening for the big guy to show some flaws, apparently.

Decline of Apple share price following Maps app problems:

Apple Press against Share Price

Lucas

Source: http://www.reportinternational.com/2013/01/the-price-for-speaking-out-of-turn/

andrew bird lizzie borden lizzie borden iona taylor allderdice mixtape andrew bogut pi day

Bipartisan outrage after House skips vote on Sandy bill

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., left, joined by other New York area-lawmakers affected by superstorm Sandy, express their anger and disappointment after learning the House Republican leadership decided to allow the current term of Congress to end without holding a vote on aid for the storm's victims, at the Capitol in Washington, early Wednesday.

By NBC News staff and wire reports

WASHINGTON -- The House of Representatives adjourned on Tuesday night without acting on a $60 billion superstorm Sandy disaster aid bill, prompting angry denunciations from members from the states hardest hit by the storm.

The GOP leadership was criticized for what one Republican called a "personal betrayal" after it was decided that the bill would not be considered until the 113th Congress, which convenes at noon on Thursday.

The current session of the House comes to an end officially on Wednesday after the new Congress elected in November gets sworn in. Legislation does not carry over from session to session, so consideration of an aid bill would have to start all over if, as expected, nothing is scheduled before then.

"I have just been informed that we will be having perhaps no further votes in this Congress," said Democratic Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland. "I am deeply disappointed at that information. We have millions of our fellow citizens who have been badly damaged by a storm called Sandy."

"We help each other," Representative Rush Holt, a Democrat of New Jersey, said on the House floor. "We always have ... There are thousands of people who are not going back to their homes. They deserve our help."

Mario Tama / Getty Images

Residents of the Northeast are still picking up the pieces after Superstorm Sandy.

They and others pleaded with the Republican leaders of the House to rethink the decision, but few were in the chamber to listen.?House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia are in charge of scheduling the House.

"For the Speaker to just walk out is inexcusable," Representative Peter King, a New York Republican, told reporters. "It's wrong and I'm saying that as a member of the Republican Party."

'Unforgivable'
In a statement, a spokesman for Boehner said: "The Speaker is committed to getting this bill passed this month." That assurance was not enough for the members who have districts that were affected by Sandy.

"I feel it is a personal betrayal," said Representative Michael Grimm, a New York Republican. "But I think more importantly, when you parse out all the politics, the people of this country that have been devastated are looking at this as a betrayal by the Congress and by the nation, and that is just untenable and unforgivable."

A bipartisan group of eight lawmakers gathered after protesting the move on the House floor after the House voted late Tuesday night to pass a bill to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff." That bill passed 257-167.

The House voted Monday to approve the Senate's fiscal cliff bill by a vote of 257-167. Richard Lui, Luke Russert and Mike Viqueira report on MSNBC.

The October 29 storm devastated New York and New Jersey coastlines with lesser damage felt along coastal areas of Delaware and Maryland.

The Senate passed a bill on December 28 by a vote of 61-33 that would provide $60.2 billion in additional aid to victims of superstorm Sandy.

During that vote, 12 Republicans supported the measure, but only after a replacement amendment that would have stripped $35 billion from the bill failed to pass.

Full Sandy coverage from NBC News

"It passed the Senate in a bipartisan way," said Representative Nita Lowey, a New York Democrat. "And again, to me this is a real betrayal, a betrayal of the leadership of the Republican Party."

The House had originally planned to consider a two-step bill that would start with $27 billion in supplemental aid, but also include an amendment worth an additional $33 billion. ?The bill had been split to allow conservative Republicans to vote for a base level of additional aid, but not the entire package, which many Republicans said did not entirely go to those affected by Sandy.

"If we get into the next Congress, you have to hit the reset button," said Representative Jon Runyan, a New Jersey Republican who added that the Sandy aid package has been largely drowned out in recent days by negotiations over the "fiscal cliff" tax hikes and spending cuts that were set to kick in starting on Tuesday.

Many Republicans in Congress say that the Sandy aid bill contains billions of dollars in spending on projects unrelated to damage caused by the storm or for long-term infrastructure improvements that should compete with other discretionary spending.

Among expenditures criticized was $150 million to rebuild fisheries, including those in the Gulf Coast and Alaska, thousands of miles from Sandy's devastation, and $2 million to repair roof damage that pre-dates the storm on Smithsonian Institution buildings in Washington.

Democrats, including New York and New Jersey senators, have argued that long-term rebuilding projects such as tunnel repairs would be delayed if the full funding was not approved. They say that businesses would not start to rebuild if they were not confident of reimbursement.

An aide for Cantor said that the House Majority Leader "is committed to ensuring the urgent needs of New York and New Jersey residents are met, and he has been working tirelessly toward that goal."

NBC News' Frank Thorp and Reuters contributed to this report.

Source: http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/02/16295303-bipartisan-outrage-after-house-skips-vote-on-60-billion-sandy-aid-bill?lite

free agents nfl 2012 milwaukee bucks bear grylls us news law school rankings gael glen rice jr bars